June 2008


stopsmiling.jpg

‘Try as you might, you can’t have complete control of re-enactments. Reality is too rich in detail. You’re bound to get something wrong. Or bound to fail to get something right.’ — Errol Morris, #79 (scroll down)


‘I have no trouble calling myself an entertainer. I should be so lucky. But that doesn’t mean I shouldn’t be held accountable for factual errors and omissions.’ — Errol Morris, #88, (scroll down)


I’ve been a fan of Errol Morris’ documentaries for several years now, & each of them, I think, warrants ambivalence if not distrust. Looking back to the earliest films, Gates of Heaven (1978) & Vernon, Florida (1982), two documentaries marked by a much greater fidelity to raw footage than his later & current work, I am struck by what now looks like reticence: Morris’ touch back then was lighter, unbolstered, I suspect, by the essential success of The Thin Blue Line (1988), whose ultimate victory was to save a man’s life, in no small part by way of a series of reenactments whose style has since become a genre in itself, especially on television (America’s Most Wanted, the entire Bill Kurtis A&E franchise, et al. — to say nothing of the additional matter of his own short-lived series & commercial work).
So it’s been for the last twenty years: each of Morris’ feature films has relied on reenactment of some kind, if only the drastic focus-pulls & blinding blow-outs of cinematographer Robert Richardson.
This post was prompted by his latest effort, Standard Operating Procedure, which takes as its subject the photographs (& photographers) from Abu Ghraib. His recent blog post on the subject  is illuminating & a welcome addition to the film itself.
“I’ll be long gone before some smart person ever figures out what happened inside this Oval Office.”—Washington, D.C., May 12, 2008
I’ve been in instrumental bands & bands with singers. The most popular of them was, not surprisingly, the group that featured the most ambitious vocals. J. & Bill tried just about everything a band like Jawbox could try. They were equally interested in harmony & melody (or the lack of harmony & melody) & the rhythmic possibilities derived from having two singers. Nevertheless, there remained a distinction between the vocals & the rest of the music, though less so than I’ve experienced elsewhere.
I think singing is the definitive mark of popular recorded or broadcast music. I limit its dominance to “recorded or broadcast” because I don’t think it applies to live performance or the relative solitude of composition, two situations whose importance remains generally accepted though in the latter case obscure, & in the former case, limited to its living duration. For example, more thoughtful time is devoted to Duke Ellington’s hits (frequently with lyrics added after the tune’s compositon, e.g. “Take the ‘A’ Train”) than to his & Strayhorn’s “Far East Suite” or “Black, Brown, and Beige.” I don’t think this phenomenon is the result of the latter pieces’ complexity. “‘A’ Train” is a deceptively elaborate composition. I think the answer lies elsewhere, in the separation of the singer from the band. The same might be said of the tenor saxophone’s lionization in jazz or the electric guitar in rock music.